Before I even knew about my daughters disappearances. I was expectantly waiting to move after the court settlement for some safety and recuperation for us all. I could not have percevied that England were at this point prepared to kill children to evade their liabilities and destroy evidence. That arresting based on statements from the dead and for offences was ever even a possibility within policing. Maybe in historical stalinist Russia, developing countries or failed states… But in England?, this was to become something that was to show the cavernous differences between Religious states and Republics, both in difference and similarities. You see this all hinged on one issue. The issue of consent in marriage, being not required in Christian countries, a requirement in 7 western Republics and ignoring consent within marriage in Islamic Jurisprudence forbidden by God.
England Ireland Scotland and Wales were determined to pursue this issue, along with previous empires India, Canada, African nations including Nigeria and Traditional Orthodox teachings in Judeo traditions. That the common law case by the court over ruled the Statute. That a husband required no consent with relations in marriage.
Having won the civil law case of trespass and notably corruption by the state of England to try and prevent evidence being heard of the active covering for the offending. Yet once it was heard in London, the battle was to begin. Consent in Islamic Jurisprudence is expected and violence within marriage is forbidden. London was not prepared to compensate a woman her losses and the truth for women was exposed for everyone to see.
That truth that compensating a woman in England was both morally and legally rebutted. Astounding as this may sound. A constitutional monarchy was prepared to fund the security for a prolific child sex offender in America, with the help of France. And felt empowered to employ non English staff in policing and people with criminal records to identify and attack witnesses to try and cover the facts…
The second arrest for me was following a call on Christmas day at tea time. My daughter, had been taken to Wales and put in a flat with a male. She was told to call me. Through the sobbing she was able to tell me that she had been drugged and used by a gang. Whilst Wales were paid by the British authorities for her ‘care’ There were in excess of thirty social workers listed in that tiny village. None worked in an office. They still to this day recieve money for my daughter who I was to find out is missing presumed dead. Within seven days of that call I was arrested for an offence that is not listed in statute. Stalking without fear of violence. repealled in 2002. Not necessarily an arrestable offence even then.
It was during this arrest it became obvious how England, Wales, Scotland. Ireland and France were receiving funds for numerous children attacked by governance workers or witnesses. The countries are not self supporting. They are massively indebted and in England’s case the countries paying and underwriting the failure and debt is the Middle East.
England were clearly faking records of children in care whilst demanding funding. At the same time I like thousands of others faced arrest. In my case for a crime that does not exist, receiving a call from my daughter and being accused of stalking for going to make sure she was ok. The officers responsible for this, eastern european’s, working in British Policing. After eight hours locked in a cell and later police staff refusing to communicate with legal advisers from the Middle East and Asia. I realised that this was actually a far larger situation of cultural and religious significance. The Judeo Christians were determined to fight for the right to abuse women and children. Something that I cannot even begin to comprehend.
My settlement for the loss of my home and career were just a drop in the ocean. However I realise that in England it would be an admission, an acceptance that their jurisprudence is null and void at the behest of militia and judeo christian religion. This reality is something that England would often blame other countries for. Yet here they were for the world to see allowing crimes against children and women so horrific that aside from war time situations ( even then child murder is not acceptable) they were trying to stop any witnessing of the crimes.
It was after the arrest I was bailed and it was clear that military rule using the technology and training from Israel was the foundation. My daughter I was later told was murdered by the male in the apartment. Her body was dumped in a nearby reservoir. The males were all ex military. Her whereabouts was disclosed via the use of Israeli intelligence and British ex military operating in France and UK. Her disposal was because there would have rightly have been a refusal to pay a ransom. So instead the Welsh receive approximately 700 GBPs every week for her care fees. Whilst in reality i was reliably told she is dead. This is the UK and France using Israeli technology to extort and steal and murder. For financial or some other perceived gain. The technology although purchased from Israel, is designed for war and defence. England and France have used it for a different purpose.
Since issuing the case to review the situation, it became public knowledge when the USA publicly dumped the files showing that the centre of security that was provided for the mass rape of children was provided by English Police and public figures. These men and women used extortion blackmail and the offenders were documented to have eaten children. The USA and other countries were keen to prosecute such horrific crimes. However it wasEngland that refused. They sought support from France and Germany to do so.
The High Court review is due and it is not just about me, or about my daughters, it is about how this even happened and was facilitated… Within weeks of the court date being issued, two males were arrested. Andrew Mountbatten and Lord Mandelson. Both of these males had been involved in the situation with a convicted child sex offender. Even in some cases actually trying to introduce the child sex offender to countries across the world. Knowing that this would be used against any who took part.
What was a very straightforward case. That was devastating for me personally with huge personal losses. became something bigger. Something more than I could ever have comprehended. As I faced the tragedy of my daughters disappearance, my very foundations of faith in England, my country of birth were shaken. Nothing brings these children back. Yet for me the question that stands is why ? …