This sounds as though it is a very basic goal, in fact one that is not really personal, but environmentally specific. Safety is not a singular goal, it relies on a collective sense of values and behaviours. However when I look at the attacks that I have experienced and attacks that I have either witnessed or many years ago professionally statemented, it is a very real concern, as it is not a given for women and children and other vulnerable groups in England and other countries I am certain both anecdotally and statistically. Therefore it is a goal that I write about in most aspects of this blog and my writing.
More specifically this is about safety for communities that is both a moral and statutory responsibility of governance. The unwritten contract that in return for service, taxes of all forms and citizenship, the state uses those funds to deliver a functioning system that protects as much as possible the most vulnerable, equitably and as a central theme to all services that taxes fund. When this fails, when people are excluded from societal functions due to risk, injury or intimidation disability as a direct result of state/governance staff then that becomes a matter for redress.
I often write of safety and that being a related to finance. As I have given evidence already against a number of members of the police service of England and Wales, I prepare to give evidence for the second time this year. The intimidation that has been regularly detailed in this blog has meant me finding myself homeless in England for the fifth time in my life in England. Like many I am not street homeless, however the state staff action and the males paid privately from tax payers cash to intimidate and threaten and attack me as a woman to silence me from speaking about the violence I have experienced due entirely to my gender, is the reason for the homelessness. This time as was the case when I first gave a statement against the attacker a serving police officer in Hampshire, I have sought temporary refuge for safety until the court case. The council who fund the perpetrators wages, despite the civil court confirming his offences and the covering by the legal adviser for the authority and a small number of his colleagues.
I laugh and joke as much as possible about the targeting that has included, burglary, theft of personal low value items, interference with IT and messaging and emailing. My children targeted by military males and reservists and their families and private businesses who seek to escape liability for other offending by covering for the actions of these males. So safety is a massive personal goal. This is not easy and is lifelong process. When one in six males present a significant risk to women men and children and the equivalent number of women or perhaps more are prepared to cover for these actions, then the challenges of safety are ever present.
As I have secured a new home in England having had to sell and move many times to escape the targeting to intimidate me. I have settled on a house that has shutters, cctv, alarm system and in a road that is a no through, in a city that has trailblazing safety measures of the community.
This has a cost. The offender holds a position of trust and as such when the documentation detailed that he used his work position to try and escape prosecution with assistance from his colleagues ( a small number !) So safety is the goal as it should be. Corruption in other Home Counties forces Surrey and TVP have provided support to Hampshire desperately trying to escape any liability for the actions of a small number of their staff. This decision is not just flawed but simply assisting offenders. When governance becomes the offender then society has failed. Sadly Hampshire and Surrey unlike other forces, are steadfast in trying to cover the corruption of males and females in policing and other governance positions or government funded companies.
Reporting the activities and the fraud that has been used to protect offenders is the only answer. Kent and the Metropolitan Police have worked tirelessly to remove corrupt officers. Sadly these policies take time and the outcome of the court case is simply that compensation ( to provide in the first instance the replacement of the home that I lost ) This is my personal goal to move safely. Because in Hampshire in 2023, environment and security features are the only way to have security. They have a cost and my goal is to give evidence and write and blog and report tirelessly not just for my safety, but the safety of other women men and children.
This has been the hardest goal I have ever had. Since the death of my husband the safety issue was highlighted immediately. As I look back to his illness and his knowledge of what had happened to me, he spoke to me of focusing in safety. He gave me clear instructions on how to remain safe. His instructions have been tested to the limits and without any shadow of a doubt he and his colleague who also died of cancer ( was used as as part of the fraud ) I reflect on his instructions and of the tremendous support from family and friends. Safety is collective and something we are all responsible for.
NB : THERE IS A NEW APP CALLED HOLLIEGUARD. IT IS DOWNLOADABLE TO THE SMART PHONE AND CONTACTS ARE ADDED. IT HAS GPS AND IF SHAKEN YOUR PHONE AUTOMATICALLY RECORDS VIDEO AND SOUND AND SENDS IT TO THE CONTACTS AND CLOUD. SO IF THE PERPETRATOR IS A POLICE OFFICER/KIDNAPNAPPING, ILLEGAL DETENTION IT IS RECORDED AND EVEN IF THE POLICE REMOVE YOUR PHONE THE ACTIONS AND LOCATION OF YOUR DETENTION IS LOCATABLE EVEN IF PHONE IS SWITCHED OFF.